The store will not work correctly when cookies are disabled.
Due to Microsoft's discontinuation of updates, including security, certain functionality such as checkout and CAD may not work for you. We recommend using Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Firefox, or Safari to ensure full functionality.Thank you - the Ruland team
Large jaw couplings are now being offered for bore sizes up to 1-3/4” or 45 mm and torque capacities of 2,655 in-lbs (300 Nm). These new large jaw couplings are designed for use in precision systems with high deceleration and acceleration curves, such as those found in semiconductor, solar, conveyor, and warehouse automation applications.
Pre-assembled modular mounting systems are designed for adjustability across many mounting applications. Conveyor mounting systems emphasize strict parallel installation using a flange-bolt base and a conveyor rail guide. Sensor mounting systems offer flexibility in a mounting application with adjustable or 90-degree connectors, two-way bases, and various mounting brackets. Both systems include stainless steel rods (with or without scale) from 100mm to 300mm in length, zinc clamping levers, and connectors that allow adjustment of the rods’ position.
Mountable shaft collars with face holes are designed to mate directly with components such as sprockets, pulleys, and metallic plates. Ruland manufactures them with drilled holes for mounting flexibility or threaded holes for the most secure connection between the collar and mated component. They are offered in steel, aluminum, and 303 stainless steel in bore sizes ranging from 3/8” to 2” and 10mm to 50mm.
How Do I Interchange Couplings With Different RPM Ratings?
How Do I Interchange Couplings With Different RPM Ratings?
Release Date: May 13, 2020
How Do I Interchange Couplings With Different RPM Ratings?
Transcript
Location: Sioux Falls, SD Question: How do I interchange couplings with different RPM ratings? Answer:In the small servo coupling range, like what we make, there is no standardization like there is in something like the L-series type jaw couplings. For example, we rate our couplings with all factors at maximum. The primary factors are torque, misalignment, and speed. We feel this gives designers the best information on how hard the coupling can actually be pushed. Every manufacturer is different, though, and communicates information that they feel best informs their audience. In this case being discussed, this manufacturer uses a hypothetical rating with performance factors isolated. If there is no torque and no misalignment, it is conceivable that the beam coupling could perform at that RPM. It probably depends on how hot the shafts get. When you account for axial motion, it's primarily thermal expansion of the shafts, so as long as the shafts aren't too hot it's conceivable the coupling could work at that RPM. To be clear, I'm not suggesting that one system is better or worse. They're both valid. The engineer needs to understand how the manufacturer rates their couplings so they can account for that in their design as well as how they test within the system. One thing that is consistent among us manufacturers is that we recommend to test, test, test, before implementing.