The store will not work correctly in the case when cookies are disabled.
Due to Microsoft's discontinuation of updates, including security, certain functionality such as checkout and CAD may not work for you. We recommend using Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Firefox, or Safari to ensure full functionality.Thank you - the Ruland team
Mountable shaft collars with face holes are designed to mate directly with components such as sprockets, pulleys, and metallic plates. Ruland manufactures them with drilled holes for mounting flexibility or threaded holes for the most secure connection between the collar and mated component. They are offered in steel, aluminum, and 303 stainless steel in bore sizes ranging from 3/8” to 2” and 10mm to 50mm.
Clamp style universal joints improve over set screw style because they do not mar the shaft, offer infinite adjustability, and can be used on all shaft types. Ruland is the only North American supplier of clamp style universal joints and manufactures the clamp feature, bores, and keyways in our advanced manufacturing facility in Marlborough, MA USA. They are available in sizes from 1/4" to 1 1/4” in steel for high strength and stainless steel for corrosion resistance.
How Do I Interchange Couplings With Different RPM Ratings?
How Do I Interchange Couplings With Different RPM Ratings?
Release Date: May 13, 2020
How Do I Interchange Couplings With Different RPM Ratings?
Transcript
Location: Sioux Falls, SD Question: How do I interchange couplings with different RPM ratings? Answer:In the small servo coupling range, like what we make, there is no standardization like there is in something like the L-series type jaw couplings. For example, we rate our couplings with all factors at maximum. The primary factors are torque, misalignment, and speed. We feel this gives designers the best information on how hard the coupling can actually be pushed. Every manufacturer is different, though, and communicates information that they feel best informs their audience. In this case being discussed, this manufacturer uses a hypothetical rating with performance factors isolated. If there is no torque and no misalignment, it is conceivable that the beam coupling could perform at that RPM. It probably depends on how hot the shafts get. When you account for axial motion, it's primarily thermal expansion of the shafts, so as long as the shafts aren't too hot it's conceivable the coupling could work at that RPM. To be clear, I'm not suggesting that one system is better or worse. They're both valid. The engineer needs to understand how the manufacturer rates their couplings so they can account for that in their design as well as how they test within the system. One thing that is consistent among us manufacturers is that we recommend to test, test, test, before implementing.